Are you an atheist?

Are you an atheist?


  • Total voters
    351
Just dealing with contradictions, here. And far too many to post. It would greatly exceed the 25,000 character limit of posts on this forum.

The terrible advice on some other day.

Excerpted from:
http://www.amazon.com/Lucifers-Handbook-Simplified-Critique-Religion-ebook/dp/B003DKJBWM


Mt 2:13 Wise men follow star and report to Herod. Herod has all children slaughtered, and
Joseph and family flee to Egypt, where Jesus grows up. Contra Mk, Lk, & Jn, in which none of
this happened. Lk 2:39 says Jesus grew up in Nazareth.
Matthew 2:13.......KJV
13 And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.

Libre.....Notice the phrase.'until I bring word'........Also rem, that Herod died that night of the killings of the children. It did not continue after that.

Then look to Matthew 2, 15: (And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.)

The book you speak of adds in "where he grew up" and does not tell you he was called out of Egypt.......No wonder there is a conflict...

Satan has done his home work. What is the best way to keep you away from God. Deception.. we see that directly used with Eve and many other places in the Bible. I find it interesting Satan's very name 'Lucifer' is listed on your book of choice.

I can debunk all the others and probably add a few of my own.

(i.e. Abraham and Isaac...you know the story..Yet when they left the MTN, in Genesis 22: 19: (Then Abraham returned to his servants, and they set off together for Beersheba. And Abraham stayed in Beersheba.)

Where is Isaac?????? he is not mentioned until later in Genesis where he is getting married.

The Bible does this a lot. Realistically, we know that Abraham had his son with him when he went down the mountain, however, the spotlight is not on Isaac anymore until later.

********** One more********

Lk 23:6 Pilate sends Jesus to Herod; Herod sends Him back. Contra other three Gospels, in which he does no such thing.
I urge you to use this link and read the article...There were several Herods in the Bible. http://www.gotquestions.org/Herods.html

Do you have a specific Contradiction you would like me to address.

Have a good day.

Blade
icon7.gif
 
Rhetoric????? Why do we try and get you to save your soul. Ask yourself--WHY? What do we get out of it????? NOTHING

I personally could be your friend regardless of your religious persuasion. Yet, for, I guess the humanity of it, I try to get you to choose to live forever?

My Bad

Have a good day my friend

Blade
icon7.gif
You don't know my faith. I'm just trying to get one point across. If you turn people away from the Gospel through rhetoric are you not committing a sin? The answer shouldn't require fifteen paragraphs.
 
Blade, I'm curious to know how you can stand there with a straight face and call the Bible the inerrant word of God in one post while in another stating that you know your preferred version (which you've already said is 100% accurate and divinely inspired) has...issues.
Hi Frothy...I will answer your and Doc's question/statement here.

We are in a time like no other, because we can read the Bible and go to the originals if needed to check for accuracy. At no other time in history has this been possible.

Most all the discrepancies are caused by the definition where a different word is used here and there.The original meaning remains the same. At one post you correctly said that "rapture' was not in the Bible. Yet, in the KJV the Phrase is "caught-up' which pertains to the words, Raptura (Medevil Latin) means seizing or carrying away. While it is not used in our Bible today, the meaning of this word is used. The Greek (septuagint) word for 'caught-up' is Harpozo. In Hebrew, saphah (caught-up) is the transliteraltion of the original word -- סָפָה

The scribes rightly used the word 'caught-up' where in all 3 original translated languages the meaning of their word is or is close to the same.

Another word 'Church',,,,,,what I am going to do is give you a link and let you see for yourselves if you please. However, the the Hebrew word 'qahal' ( the word in Herbrew language will not print on my computer). Anyways, It means congregation. The Septuagint is Ekklesia means "assembly of the citizens".
http://www.graftedinfellowship.org/uploads/5/7/3/3/5733440/the_word_church.pdf


The Bible follows all three and when need the original codex (scrolls) very closely regardless of what you have heard.. Do you really think that God would allow his book to be desecrated. I think Not? but you really need to answer that question yourself.

There is already one written by Lucifer out there. Even has his name on it.

Have a nice day......

Blade
icon7.gif
 
You don't know my faith. I'm just trying to get one point across. If you turn people away from the Gospel through rhetoric are you not committing a sin? The answer shouldn't require fifteen paragraphs.

The level of Apostasy in the Local Churches today is unbelievable. They are addressed in the Bible and will be judged accordingly when the time comes.

Rhetoric- language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.

This is a gotcha question!. What you want a Yes or a No.......?.

To be a false Prophet , Yes, is considered a sin!

have nice day

Blade
icon7.gif
 
You don't know my faith. I'm just trying to get one point across. If you turn people away from the Gospel through rhetoric are you not committing a sin? The answer shouldn't require fifteen paragraphs.

You are right, I do not know you faith but you project you are an Atheist or a Agnostic. If this is the case you have no faith or allegiance except to Satan.
confused.gif


Have a Good Day...


Blade
icon7.gif
 
So basically you're once again backtracking on the whole 'inspired word of God' and going with 'translating is difficult so God tells us what is correct'. Got it, you're basically once again dodging a question you can't answer.

So when (as always happens) different people disagree on a translation, how do you determine which one speaks for God and which one sold his soul to Satan? Oh, right, the one who agrees with your pre-existing belief is the one who obviously speaks for God. Funny how God ALWAYS agrees with you no matter how far into crazyland you go.

AB is right. The drivel spewing forth every time you post is rhetoric, nothing more.
 
You are right, I do not know you faith but you project you are an Atheist or a Agnostic. If this is the case you have no faith or allegiance except to Satan.
confused.gif


Have a Good Day...


Blade
icon7.gif

Out of curiosity, if AB is atheist (and I don't know that he is), how can you go from 'believes there is no such thing as Satan' to 'has sworn allegiance to Satan'? Sounds like you are, as usual, projecting your insanity on AB.
 
If this is the case you have no faith or allegiance except to Satan.
confused.gif

When you say something like this it is so unfathomably insulting that you cannot possibly have any emotional connection to your words.

You come across as an insufferable know it all who hasn't (unable?) experienced the hurt that such rhetoric causes.
 
When you say something like this it is so unfathomably insulting that you cannot possibly have any emotional connection to your words.

You come across as an insufferable know it all who hasn't (unable?) experienced the hurt that such rhetoric causes.

Oh, I rather doubt he cares. If you don't believe precisely as he does, after all, you're The Enemy.
 
not going to get in a food fight with you Frothy.

Blade
banginghead.gif

Then drop my last sentence. All you're doing is dodging the question.

If someone explicitly does not believe Satan exists, how is it conceivably possible for them to have sworn allegiance to them?
 
When you say something like this it is so unfathomably insulting that you cannot possibly have any emotional connection to your words.

You come across as an insufferable know it all who hasn't (unable?) experienced the hurt that such rhetoric causes.

I am sorry you feel that way..This has nothing to with insults. You just don't want to hear it. God actually threw Satan out of heaven and gave him this earth to rule. If you do not believe in God, then you obviously (aware of it or not) are siding with Satan. It is that simple.

If rhetoric (why so cryptic) hurt someone, that I too have feelings for that person but there are a lot of people out there that have the same amount or more pain than we are speaking of here. Yet, they turn to God for Comfort. They move on never forgetting the pain, but move on.

If you do not move on, you will wallow in hatred and anger because this is what Satan wants.

Look, I have said it before, your sins have been paid for by Blood. All you have to do is ask him to help you. He will know what is in your heart? so don't try to deceive him.

Don't worry about all those things that have evidently told to you by the Local Church....things that you have to do to get to heaven........
.

All you have to do is ASK......anywhere, anytime..It is that simple.

Have a good day..
Blade
icon7.gif
 
The level of Apostasy in the Local Churches today is unbelievable. They are addressed in the Bible and will be judged accordingly when the time comes.

Rhetoric- language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.

This is a gotcha question!. What you want a Yes or a No.......?.

To be a false Prophet , Yes, is considered a sin!

have nice day

Blade
icon7.gif

I get your passion, I'm suggesting a little less fire and brimstone and a little more "good news". If people are going to Hell, no need to give them a push.:)
 
Then drop my last sentence. All you're doing is dodging the question.

If someone explicitly does not believe Satan exists, how is it conceivably possible for them to have sworn allegiance to them?

Just because you do not believe in Satan or God, does not mean they aren't there.

Look, Frothy, it is alright with me, I do care or I would not be here taking these insults some of you throw out. But in the end it is really up to you...

I can tell you how simple it is, It is up to you to use that info or NOT? Your Choice!

Question: Why do you keep trying to debunk my views, attitude instead of the addressing the Bible?

Does not make sense.......If you destroy me, you destroy my personal projection of faith, you still do not destroy the Bible. If you were to destroy the Bible, WELL NOW that would be something,,,would it not?

If you are not interested, quit asking questions?

If you just want to argue with me,..........

Blade
banginghead.gif
 
Your weaseling around the question still doesn't answer it: In what way is it conceivable that a person who literally does not believe an entity exists is knowingly and willingly swearing allegiance to that entity. Your argument that we agnostics and atheists have sworn allegiance to Satan makes as much sense as me saying you have sworn allegiance to Xenu and are part of the ongoing conspiracy to keep our souls polluted with thetans.

I have no interest in destroying you, nor have I ever tried. I haven't even told you that you will be tortured for eternity for daring to not agree with me, which you have done several times, along with accusing me of being evil, a traitor, a would-be murderer, that I've sworn my soul to demons, and the like.

The insults? I think you're willfully blind to reason, completely dishonest (you've lied repeatedly in this thread), and a racist (which I loathe with a holy passion), and after the crap you've said about me before, I'm long since done hiding it. But that said, my only goal here is to get you to start using your brain.
 
Last edited:
Your weaseling around the question still doesn't answer it: In what way is it conceivable that a person who literally does not believe an entity exists is knowingly and willingly swearing allegiance to that entity.

To be fair, he did say something about how you might be unknowingly siding with Satan. It still makes no sense, but he definitely didn't say it was being done knowingly.

The example you gave about Xenu is every bit as logical-yet-full-of-bulls&*t, but I doubt he'll see it as such.
 
To be fair, he did say something about how you might be unknowingly siding with Satan. It still makes no sense, but he definitely didn't say it was being done knowingly.

The example you gave about Xenu is every bit as logical-yet-full-of-bulls&*t, but I doubt he'll see it as such.

1) Fair enough.
2) Agreed.
 
I am sorry you feel that way..This has nothing to with insults. You just don't want to hear it. God actually threw Satan out of heaven and gave him this earth to rule. If you do not believe in God, then you obviously (aware of it or not) are siding with Satan. It is that simple.

Once you've pointed it out, they ARE aware of it. Not being aware has nothing to do with it being or not being an insult. Once we've gotten to the point of discussing the notion of insults, the issue of awareness is done. Awareness first, insult next. Do you understand that basic sequence of events? Is that simple enough for YOU to understand?

Your words cause emotional harm. Stop weaseling, as Froth says, and take responsibility for them.
 
Just because you do not believe in Satan or God, does not mean they aren't there.

I think I'll use this line the next time I miss a client's deadline. Just because I haven't delivered the work doesn't mean that it's not finished. Another line that has no practical value at all.
 
Just because you don't believe in the pussy troll Pillowpants doesn't mean he's not there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom