DickyP
Active member
- Local time
- Today, 10:57
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2024
- Messages
- 311
Arguably neither did the participants!right on. Last five people I asked this week did not know what the Boston Tea Party was about.
Arguably neither did the participants!right on. Last five people I asked this week did not know what the Boston Tea Party was about.
Right on Doc and your not even a Yankee. Should be going by your house next Tue. but don't have time to stop, but I'll wave.Ha! That's easy. The Boston Tea Party was about getting an early world's record for the largest batch of cold-brewed tea.
Now, of course, someone will take me seriously and talk about how Guiness didn't sponsor world-record events back then.
For those folks who actually DON'T know the answer, it was a tax thing, because King George of England imposed a new tax on tea, which England could do at the time because tea wasn't grown in the colonies. The "Boston Tea Party" destroyed crates of tea on which the Imperial taxes had been imposed.
I suppose in the absence of a suitable male candidate, a female could do it - with help of course. After all, I doesn't seem that hard signing things.Vote Pat Hartman for president,
Why do I feel Sleepy Joe with bow out at the last minute.Pat would do WAY better than Vice President Kamala Harris, who is also reputedly a female. Though people see her so rarely these days that the more important statistic is "still breathing." With Sleepy Joe, the more important statistic is "still coherent" and that one is up for grabs.
I'm surprised you would want someone with such discriminatory views as either VP or president. But I suppose nothing in the USA should surprise any more. Look at the two November candidates - an old geezer who sleeps alot and a criminal. No wonder the world thinks its a joke, you couldn't make it up.Pat would do WAY better than Vice President Kamala Harris, who is also reputedly a female.
I'm surprised you would want someone with such discriminatory views as either VP or president.
I wasn't referring to Kamala Harris. Never heard of him/ her before reading it on the forum yesterday. It's not a name that pops up on our news.I wasn't referring to Kamala Harris. Never heard of him/ her before reading it on the forum yesterday. It's not a name that pops up on our news.
Col
I wasn't referring to Kamala Harris. Never heard of him/ her before reading it on the forum yesterday. It's not a name that pops up on our news.
Col
Don't be shy Colin, tell them who you disapprove of and why because clearly they missed your dig.I wasn't referring to Kamala Harris.
I didn't think Vice Presidens did anything anyway. Aren't they there just in case the president gets shot or ill? The only ones I remember are Dan Quale and Spiro Agnew.
Col
Seems logical that she would. Surely you don't expect fairness in the American government.VP Harris had the chance to cast a vote to decide some issues. Which, of course, she decided in favor of HER party, not the Republicans.
your right, or anywhere else for that matter. The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?Seems logical that she would. Surely you don't expect fairness in the American government.
Col
I'm not shy Patricia. The suggested name for President was a joke (I hope)Don't be shy Colin, tell them who you disapprove of and why because clearly they missed your dig.
I've just seen a picture of this Kamala - she's quite attractive. I can see why Old Joe appointed her, must be nice having that floating around the place.Just for the record, Col, Kamala Harris is a female, our Vice-President, and a political train-wreck.
Pretty smile. Total airhead if you listen to her talk.I've just seen a picture of this Kamala - she's quite attractive. I can see why Old Joe appointed her, must be nice having that floating around the place.
Col