Trump Administration Predictions (3 Viewers)

[Pat Hartman]

I don't think the people that were at work in the Capital that day share y'alls version of the truth.

They were lied to regarding what was actually going on with the people inside the building. I would have been terrified if the people ushering me out of the building told me that there were people with weapons inside the building rioting. That isn't at all what we saw in the videos. And it wasn't at all what happened. So, this is SOP for the Democrats. Lie, lie, lie, and keep repeating the lie until all you hear is the lie no matter what media outlet you are viewing and so the lie seems like it must be true.

Where are all the clips of the people rampaging inside the building? We see a small group breaking down the door where Babbitt was murdered. The other interior clips are mostly people wandering around taking selfies and admiring the art. We did see the guy who tried to take out the podium and Nancy's gavel but where were the videos of people breaking stuff and setting fires and brandishing weapons. Walking around holding a flag isn't "brandishing a weapon".

Please don't open your eyes at this juncture.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Which Democrats? By name. I personally have never supported the BLM movement, I have always said it was a propaganda tool to move independents to the right.

And, once again, I was correct about that.

So, let me understand this. YOU think the BLM movement was orchestrated by the conservatives? Because I know it was orchestrated by the Marxists. The fact that it caused people to turn away from the left and become more conservative would appear to me to indicate that it failed. But then what do I know. This is a really bizarre conspiracy theory. One that I believe is a figment of your imagination.

 

[AccessBlaster]

If you want to see a real insurrection with guns and tanks check out Syria, Jan 6th was a joke in comparison.

 

[Thales750]

So, let me understand this. YOU think the BLM movement was orchestrated by the conservatives? Because I know it was orchestrated by the Marxists. The fact that it caused people to turn away from the left and become more conservative would appear to me to indicate that it failed. But then what do I know. This is a really bizarre conspiracy theory. One that I believe is a figment of your imagination.

The conspiracy is way beyond anything you believe. You only see what they want you to see, just like the Liberals. Although, you should be seeing it, you, at least, see the Citizens United for what it is.

The conspiracy hasn't changed since the beginning of time, the tools have evolved.

The ultra rich, the crown, call them whatever, they are behind all of this divide. The more divided, the more the money and power move up. The more poor people there are, the more power their money brings

Here is how this works. Doc worked his whole life for government or corporations, yet he believes that Agencies should not be able to institate regulations without the explicit direction from Congress. Why does he believe that?

Easy, it is in the best interest of the owner of all new media for him to believe it.

Here is an example:
In 1975 the Federal Communications Commission initiated the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rule, which bars a single company from owning a newspaper and a broadcast station in the same market. Regan started the erode this, Clinton laid it to rest.
In June 1987, Congress attempted to preempt the FCC decision and codify the Fairness Doctrine, (Fairness in Broadcasting Act of 1987 S. 742).

The bill passed but the legislation was vetoed by President Ronald Reagan.

In the Clinton Admin:

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was an influential act for media cross-ownership.

Two seemingly disconnected events, yet in both cases The People paid the price, and more wealth was redistributed up.

All propagandas is designed to concentrate, consolidate and redistribute wealth to the Capitalist Overlords. The true power.

So yes, propaganda can be designed as a false flag, as long as the ultimate result is to divide the people.

 

[Thales750]

If you want to see a real insurrection with guns and tanks check out Syria, Jan 6th was a joke in comparison.

Back when I was still a drunk, in the days just proceeding sobriety. I learned a revelation.

Drunks in denial will look at other worse drunks and say, "I'm not a drunk, look at ol' Billy over there."


Other people's acts, no matter how egregious, are not part of the equation.

There is currently no forgiveness for Trump. Let's see if he offer up some retribution, and earn some.

 

[Thales750]

They were lied to regarding what was actually going on with the people inside the building. I would have been terrified if the people ushering me out of the building told me that there were people with weapons inside the building rioting. That isn't at all what we saw in the videos. And it wasn't at all what happened. So, this is SOP for the Democrats. Lie, lie, lie, and keep repeating the lie until all you hear is the lie no matter what media outlet you are viewing and so the lie seems like it must be true.

Where are all the clips of the people rampaging inside the building? We see a small group breaking down the door where Babbitt was murdered. The other interior clips are mostly people wandering around taking selfies and admiring the art. We did see the guy who tried to take out the podium and Nancy's gavel but where were the videos of people breaking stuff and setting fires and brandishing weapons. Walking around holding a flag isn't "brandishing a weapon".

Please don't open your eyes at this juncture.

If you rob a bank with a fake gun, you're still a bank robber.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Back when I was still a drunk, in the days just proceeding sobriety. I learned a revelation.

Drunks in denial will look at other worse drunks and say, "I'm not a drunk, look at ol' Billy over there."


Other people's acts, no matter how egregious, are not part of the equation.

There is currently no forgiveness for Trump. Let's see if he offer up some retribution, and earn some.

If you're going to call something an insurrection shouldn't it live up to the hype? Not withstanding how drunk one might be.

 

[Isaac]

Stick to the subject. Jan 6 and the President falsely claiming that there was voter fraud that involves more than some local yocal back water town.

In fact, if you can produce a single AP, Newsweek, or Wall Street Journal article substantiating these "facts" I will give them consideration.

Better yet, videos of C-SPAN recordings of testimonies that will give any credibility to these claims.

He's absolutely entitled to his opinion that there was fraud, as many of us still are of that opinion as well. There's nothing wrong with him stating his opinion that he thinks there was some kind of shenanigans and he is not responsible for everything that happened on Jay 6, although I think he should have done more to quell it faster and louder when it happened. I don't consider him 100% blame free, but to me the subject is choosing to prosecute the 10,000th riot rather than the first 9,999.

Also pretending that it was an insurrection that almost overthrew the government of the United States is absolutely ridiculous. And that is the subject according to you right?

 

[Thales750]

Also pretending that it was an insurrection that almost overthrew the government of the United States is absolutely ridiculous. And that is the subject according to you right?

I never said it was a threat to our country. It is an assault on our rule of law.

Something that should be ingrained in every American's ethos.

It is so lame to use the "other kids are doing it" excuse. My Texas mother would have fixed that notion real quick.

 

[Thales750]

If you're going to call something an insurrection shouldn't it live up to the hype? Not withstanding how drunk one might be.

If you're going to be particular about it, maybe we should call it storming the castle. Except that has a courageous connotation.

How about a siege? Yeah that works, siege. His worshipers laid siege to the Capital Building.

Damn, that sounds good.

 

[AccessBlaster]

If you're going to be particular about it, maybe we should call it storming the castle. Except that has a courageous connotation.

How about a siege? Yeah that works, siege. His worshipers laid siege to the Capital Building.

Damn, that sounds good.

Usually the government being attacked doesn't embed operatives into the crowd to facilitate the "insurrection" against itself. When you have agents embedded in the mob acting as instigators, and you have agents opening security doors its not an "insurrection" it's theater.

That's why I disagree with the term.

 

[Thales750]

Usually the government being attacked doesn't embed operatives into the crowd to facilitate the "insurrection" against itself. When you have agents embedded in the mob acting as instigators, and you have agents opening security doors its not an "insurrection" it's theater.

That's why I disagree with the term.

What talking head convinced you that there were infiltrators? Y'all say things like its a known fact or something, You have to respect that level of dogma.

 

[AccessBlaster]

What talking head convinced you that there were infiltrators? Y'all say things like its a known fact or something, You have to respect that level of dogma.

it's undisputed.

 

[Pat Hartman]

How about a siege? Yeah that works, siege. His worshipers laid siege to the Capital Building.

OMG. What do you call the event in Seattle where Antifa occupied blocks of a neighborhood for days and the police did nothing to evict them? Near as I can tell, the Jan 6 "parade" lasted a couple of hours and people were waived into the building and given guided tours. No one stopped anyone from entering. Duh! Do you just make this stuff up or do you get it all from Rachael Maddow?

People got arrested for "parading" so let's call it what it was - A parade inside the Capitol Building. NO ONE got arrested for insurrection. But keep up spreading your lies.

 

[AccessBlaster]

NO ONE got arrested for insurrection. But keep up spreading your lies.

 

[Thales750]

OMG. What do you call the event in Seattle where Antifa occupied blocks of a neighborhood for days and the police did nothing to evict them? Near as I can tell, the Jan 6 "parade" lasted a couple of hours and people were waived into the building and given guided tours. No one stopped anyone from entering. Duh! Do you just make this stuff up or do you get it all from Rachael Maddow?

People got arrested for "parading" so let's call it what it was - A parade inside the Capitol Building. NO ONE got arrested for insurrection. But keep up spreading your lies.

Approximately 944 defendants have had their cases adjudicated and received sentences for their criminal activity on Jan. 6. Approximately 562 have been sentenced to periods of incarceration. Aug 6, 2024

Obviously, not from the antigovernment propaganda machine.

According to the nut cases you listen to, the entire government is out to get Trump. OMG, we gotta stop those face eating alien invaders.

Justice Department

 

[Thales750]

43 Months Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol

www.justice.gov

 

[The_Doc_Man]

@Thales750, I hate to say this, but I would prefer to palaver with ColinEssex than with you. His hatred is more anti-American but laughably predictable. I would even prefer our proselytizer Aziz Razul. His delusions are religious, but at least he is open about it being religious fervor and thus also highly predictable. Your posts have reached the level of "execrable" but then again, this IS a non-technical forum where even execrable ideas are permitted. Your pervasive, persistent, but not particularly perspicacious blindness to the ills of the Left, as shown by your continued attempts to denigrate the actions of the Right, just show you to be a negative person whose cocktail-party dialog will end up isolating you to hanging around the punch bowl.

 

[AccessBlaster]

43 Months Since the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol

www.justice.gov

We know the numbers of arrests, what were asking is, where is the insurrection part? You keep throwing out a term Parroted by leftwing media without any evidence of insurrection.

 

[Thales750]

We know the numbers of arrests, what were asking is, where is the insurrection part? You keep throwing out a term Parroted by leftwing media without any evidence of insurrection.

I thought I renamed it a siege? It was a violent break in.

Just because your news sources cut out the violence, doesn't mean it wasn't there. I watched it live.

And show any evidence that there was voter corruption?