Trump Administration Predictions

The_Doc_Man said:
@Thales750, I hate to say this, but I would prefer to palaver with ColinEssex than with you. His hatred is more anti-American but laughably predictable. I would even prefer our proselytizer Aziz Razul. His delusions are religious, but at least he is open about it being religious fervor and thus also highly predictable. Your posts have reached the level of "execrable" but then again, this IS a non-technical forum where even execrable ideas are permitted. Your pervasive, persistent, but not particularly perspicacious blindness to the ills of the Left, as shown by your continued attempts to denigrate the actions of the Right, just show you to be a negative person whose cocktail-party dialog will end up isolating you to hanging around the punch bowl.
Click to expand...
He lead them to attack the Congress Building, he inspired them to " Stop The Steal". which was a complete lie. (you are welcome to produce any legitimate news reporting of this evidence).

If this was a RICO case he would have been imprisoned for life,
 
Thales750 said:
I thought I renamed it a siege? It was a violent break in.

Just because your news sources cut out the violence, doesn't mean it wasn't there. I watched it live.

And show any evidence that there was voter corruption?
Click to expand...

You asked for evidence. This isn't proof - but someone else did find some seriously questionable issues. Like I said before, the 2020 election is now water under the bridge. After the 2024 election, Trump is back in and has a chance to break up at least some of the deep state.
 

Attachments

Thales750 said:
you are welcome to produce any legitimate news reporting of this evidence).
Click to expand...

Even if I did, you would instantly question it. Don't you realize that your credibility on this subject is near nil?
 
The_Doc_Man said:
Even if I did, you would instantly question it. Don't you realize that your credibility on this subject is near nil?
Click to expand...
Only with the MAGA brainwashed. Many of which are self proclaimed winner-take-all capitalist cheering squad.

Not actually being capitalist themselves.


Over the years my understanding of the economy has been questioned many times, and ultimately I have been proven right again and again. Musk cam up with a doozy recently can to share that with. Can't wait to hear what the choir has to say.
 
AccessBlaster said:
We know the numbers of arrests, what were asking is, where is the insurrection part? You keep throwing out a term Parroted by leftwing media without any evidence of insurrection.
Click to expand...
@Thales750: You fail to recognize that the (fake) "arrests" where political persecutions by the Stalinist Biden administration. There was no insurrection. Fake lefwing news propaganda to be consumed by the ignorant and the gullible. Seems that you took the bait.
 
Thales750 said:
Other people's acts, no matter how egregious, are not part of the equation.
Click to expand...
This is where you're just fundamentally, totally, completely wrong.

In discussions about selective prosecution, unfair prosecution, politicized prosecution, and Elections in general, other people's actions absolutely are part of the equation to any normal minded person.
 
Thales750 said:
He lead them to attack the Congress Building, he inspired them to " Stop The Steal". which was a complete lie. (you are welcome to produce any legitimate news reporting of this evidence).

If this was a RICO case he would have been imprisoned for life,
Click to expand...
He told them to be peaceful. And saying stuff like "keep up the fight", are totally normal phrases to use in politics or pretty much any cause whatsoever. It never means to actually go and physically fight someone. People got out of hand, J6 was wrong and bad, it's just funny how you cannot admit it pales in comparison to the real riots we endured for years - and it's very telling which one and only one you want to prosecute. It shows you have blinders on and tunnel vision.

Ask yourself, why would Trump want those people to riot? Knowing, obviously, that a few hundred unarmed people had no chance of overthrowing the US government and overcoming the US military. He may have wanted people to protest and make a fuss over him, as usual, do you REALLY believe he specifically wanted people to try to beat police and break windows and doors? Why? What good would it have caused him, he could easily foresee the trouble it was going to cause him and actually did cause him.

The only rational conclusion to a rational person without blinders on is, "ok, that's true - he probably didn't actually want that, and wasn't intending on encouraging it, as it was the opposite of his own best interests".
 
1734032658252.png
 
We'll see if Thales changes the subject - or claims we've changed the subject - or realizes that Trump never told people to riot, he merely expressed his OPINION - which we're all entitled to - that there was fraud. Which there most likely was, but it cannot be proven well.
 
Consider the recent remarks by Elizabeth Warren concerning the killing of Brian Thompson.
www.boston.com

'People can be pushed only so far': Warren reacts to killing of health care CEO

“Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren said in response to the shooting.
www.boston.com
Warren was essentially legitimizing the execution of Thompson under the pretext that the assassin was somehow justified based on emotion. It appears that those on the left are finding that narrative to be a rallying cry.

Yet, when it comes to a situation where Trump actually requests the public to "remain peaceful" the left somehow ignores that and demands Trump's head claiming that he incited violence.

There is also another twist. Think of Daniel Penny who was found innocent of killing a Black man. Penny was performing a civic duty protecting others on a subway car. Bragg went on to charge him with murder, even-though Penny as a good Samaritan acted as a hero.

Now, the assassin (Luigi Mangione) of Thompson is being treated by the left as a "hero". It would appear that Mangione will be charged with murder. What is incredulous is that Penny, for protecting the public, received very little positive support for being a good Samaritan to the (negative) point that he was charged with murder. On the other hand, Mangione, for his (killing) action, is receiving positive support from the left, including that of Warren. This is insane.

Considering how polarized are justice system has become and the lawfare that has been instigated by the likes of Alvin Bragg, I wonder what will happen when the Mangione case finally hits Alvin Bragg's desk?
 
I also found it puzzling, that one African American congressman's X post where he goes on and on, something like "Dear White People, do you know what it's like to see a white man killed on your newsfeed? No, you never have". And I'm thinking what the heck are you talking about? People of all colors , including whites, are the victims of a disproporionate amount of black-perpetrated crime every single day.

The truth is, there are FAR more killings BY blacks than there are these juicy-news EDGE cases like Penney's was involving a white killer. Far more, the number isn't even close. It would be like 50:1 on any given week in the US.

But they have their own story made up in their head - that everyone is after them.
 
Isaac said:
He told them to be peaceful. And saying stuff like "keep up the fight", are totally normal phrases to use in politics or pretty much any cause whatsoever. It never means to actually go and physically fight someone. People got out of hand, J6 was wrong and bad, it's just funny how you cannot admit it pales in comparison to the real riots we endured for years - and it's very telling which one and only one you want to prosecute. It shows you have blinders on and tunnel vision.

Ask yourself, why would Trump want those people to riot? Knowing, obviously, that a few hundred unarmed people had no chance of overthrowing the US government and overcoming the US military. He may have wanted people to protest and make a fuss over him, as usual, do you REALLY believe he specifically wanted people to try to beat police and break windows and doors? Why? What good would it have caused him, he could easily foresee the trouble it was going to cause him and actually did cause him.

The only rational conclusion to a rational person without blinders on is, "ok, that's true - he probably didn't actually want that, and wasn't intending on encouraging it, as it was the opposite of his own best interests".
Click to expand...
You forgot the part where he was encouraging them to stop the count.
 
AccessBlaster said:
Can you point to a thread in particular? Because if there's a unicorn thread out there, I haven't seen it.
Click to expand...
Other Conservatives in the real world that don't understand how macro economics work either.

Musk, who obviously does know, is spewing the same old blame inflation on the government line. He absolutely knows it to be a lie.
 
Isaac said:
We'll see if Thales changes the subject - or claims we've changed the subject - or realizes that Trump never told people to riot, he merely expressed his OPINION - which we're all entitled to - that there was fraud. Which there most likely was, but it cannot be proven well.
Click to expand...
The power of the President are his words.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
He still does not understand
4 5 6
Replies
102
Views
1,735
AccessBlaster
A
NauticalGent
My Facebook post on the election
Replies
7
Views
506
Pat Hartman
P
Steve R.
Biden Presidential Campaign 2024
Replies
5
Views
639
Steve R.
Steve R.
Steve R.
Sorkin Dishonestly Attacks Ackman
Replies
13
Views
331
Steve R.
Steve R.
Steve R.
The Child Free Life
Replies
1
Views
171
Isaac
Isaac

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom