Trump Administration Predictions (1 Viewer)

Since 1904 Peter Pan has been played almost exclusively by woman even though he was supposed to be a boy.
 
Since 1904 Peter Pan has been played almost exclusively by woman even though he was supposed to be a boy.

Except, of course, the Robin Williams excursion in the movie Hook, with a score by John Williams. It was fun to watch even if not terribly deep in its concepts.
 
It's because I have things to build. And, I am not playing anymore of Pat's games.
You can keep your head where the sun doesn't shine if it makes you feel smart and righteous. And whatever you do - NEVER watch the video of Biden bragging about withholding the loan UNLESS Ukraine fired the prosecutor investigating Burisma and Hunter. It will rock your world and probably send you shrieking to a safe space for cover. THAT video is what precipitated Trump's "impeachable" offense.
 
Actually, no. Peter Pan was just a wayward boy who had a bad case of "failure to launch" even though he could fly if he kept up his happy thoughts. His sidekick Tinkerbell was the fairy, a pixie with a good supply of fairy dust to enable the flying.

Oddly enough, we had a colorful character who frequented the bar where I played music to get through college. HIS stage name was "Tinkerbell" and he billed himself as the "Bourbon Street Fairy." He worked for one of the "novelty" clubs a few blocks from where I worked. If I recall correctly, his shtick was "Marlene Dietrich" lip-synch drag dance routines. He would visit our club before going on to his shift up the street so he was never in costume when we saw him.

We were pretty mild as Bourbon Street dives went at the time. A couple of go-go dancers not associated with our band, which was a small combo (5 pieces) but a great corner location in the second block off Canal Street. Back in the late 1960s, the farther away you got from Canal Street, the more... exotic things got. Our end of the street was usually sedate for at least four or five blocks.
Of course, Tinkerbell was the fairy.
 
You can keep your head where the sun doesn't shine if it makes you feel smart and righteous. And whatever you do - NEVER watch the video of Biden bragging about withholding the loan UNLESS Ukraine fired the prosecutor investigating Burisma and Hunter. It will rock your world and probably send you shrieking to a safe space for cover. THAT video is what precipitated Trump's "impeachable" offense.
So, two wrongs do make a right? I would prefer a President with honor, from either side of the aisle.

That would be better, right? Every word you utter is about justifying Trumpland with a comparison. So you say Biden was guilty, does that make Trump not guilty?
 
So, two wrongs do make a right? I would prefer a President with honor, from either side of the aisle.
What two wrongs? Presidents have ALWAYS used money to control foreign policy. But in your mind only Trump was wrong for doing it. That is the problem. I'm not trying to justify anything. I am simply trying to open your eyes to the lies you absorb and believe every single day. I don't like the practice. I would rather we just stopped trying to buy friends. It doesn't work anyway.

The difference between Trump and Biden, and it is real whether you acknowledge it or not, is whether the money was withheld for PERSONAL benefit as Biden did. Presidents don't get to withhold US money from our allies to benefit themselves or their family but that is exactly what Biden did. Sadly, you can't even acknowledge that. Your TDS is too severe. Trump did nothing that Obama and a lot of other Presidents before him have done. But Biden used the people's money as a club to benefit his son and Burisma and therefore himself since he is the "big guy" who gets a large part of the action from these money laundering schemes that Hunter was the bagman for.

I'll bet you believed the ridiculous picture of Hegseth in his bathing suit at the 911 memorial at the end of the seal swim across the Hudson was Hegseth in his underwear wandering around Manhattan too.
 
When everyone is at least a little bit corrupt, the relative differences in criminalities actually do make a difference, yes @Thales750

And selective prosecution actually is a defense to some crimes.

And the fuss they made over January 6th after doing absolutely nothing about riots a hundred times as big and with a hundred times as much frequency the year before it's just ridiculous hypocrisy.

When very few people are prosecuted for some particular type of crime, it matters a LOT who they choose to prosecute. It doesn't mean two wrongs make a right, it means selectively prosecuting only some people and only enforcing the statute once in a great while on certain people for other reasons is a third wrong.
 
When everyone is at least a little bit corrupt, the relative differences in criminalities actually do make a difference, yes @Thales750

And selective prosecution actually is a defense to some crimes.

And the fuss they made over January 6th after doing absolutely nothing about riots a hundred times as big and with a hundred times as much frequency the year before it's just ridiculous hypocrisy.

When very few people are prosecuted for some particular type of crime, it matters a LOT who they choose to prosecute. It doesn't mean two wrongs make a right, it means selectively prosecuting only some people and only enforcing the statute once in a great while on certain people for other reasons is a third wrong.
That is based on your propaganda sources. Jan 6 was definitely an insurrection, and Trump inspired it by his lies about voter fraud.

That is really what this entire 2 month long discussion has been about.

Trump lead a lethal insurrection into the Capital of the USA. End of story.
 
Out of all the things that makes me laugh, almost out loud, it's the whole "lethal insurrection" line.

Yes, Thales, 500 mostly unarmed people came very close to overthrowing the full military force of the United States and change the government.

We were truly one hair away!

On the other hand this is good news though. Nobody ever knew that a few hundred mostly unarmed people could literally overthrow the United States - this means for our next conflict, we need much fewer resources than previously thought. Maybe 600 next time.
 
And no, everything I stated is fact, and not based on any propoganda. You just closed your eyes to the 2 years worth of rioting and burning of cities across the USA. You can feel free to open them any time you want :)
 
Jan 6 was definitely an insurrection
And the BLM riots where they killed people, burned down cop cars and entire city blocks, looted stores, occupied government buildings, occupied private property, destroyed cities and lives were "mostly peaceful" demonstrations. Right. When words have no meaning, they have no meaning. Why not call Jan 6th a birthday party or a gay rights parade? Either would be just as logical since the word "insurrection" no longer has any meaning except why you now think it should mean.
 
Agree. Again with liberals re-defining words! It never stops.

And Democrats, inspired 10's of 1000's of people to burn and loot and kill in cities across America for 2 years, based on virtually every single Democrat's LIES about systemic racism and related topics. End of story. Don't vote Democrat!
 
Trump inspired it by his lies about voter fraud.

Except that as time passes, we are finding more and more evidence that there was, indeed, a large number of irregularities. Personally, I doubt they were enough to overturn the election, and that is now water under the bridge - EXCEPT that if it could be shown that there WERE serious anomalies, Trump WAS acting correctly as President to assure a legally certified result.
Trump lead a lethal insurrection into the Capital of the USA. End of story.

NOT the end of the story if you consider the verified cases of Homeland or FBI agents in the midst of that mob, provoking people. Which makes some of those convictions void by the Doctrine of Entrapment.

The "lethal" part of your comment is absolutely ludicrous.


According to Fact Check.ORG, one person died from being shot by Capitol Police. One person died of a drug overdose. Three died of natural causes. I'll allow the argument that someone may have killed himself via an overdose. No other person was killed by any of the participants.

@Thales750, you are SERIOUSLY deluded to the point that you aren't drinking the Kool-Aid any more. You are no longer a user - you are a distributor. You should be ashamed of yourself to have so much hatred in your heart as to ignore reality to this degree. DJT is a polarizing person but he is NOT the devil incarnate. Based on things that are turning up now, that devil pointer is more left-facing, I think. It is hard to say whether Papa Joe or Kamala the cackle jackal qualifies more for that honor.
 
Trump lead a lethal insurrection into the Capital of the USA. End of story.
"lethal". Hmm. Looks like another word that no longer means what it used to mean. The only person who died (actually was murdered in cold blood) that day was Ashlie Babbitt. She was shot point blank by a black officer. Apparently, it was a righteous shoot and he was never charged because she was white and a Trump supporter and he is black. It is perfectly OK for black people to kill white people, especially, if the white person is a Trump supporter even when they have no justification for the killing. The murderer now seems to be angling for a pardon from Biden because come Jan 20th, he will likely be arrested for murder.
 
Yeah Democrats oversaw 100's of actually-lethal riots for 2 years, directly inspired by their lies to black people that basically stirred up a frenzy that "everyone is after me" - and did absolutely nothing about it, in some cases supporting the rioters.

J6 comes and no building burns and nobody dies FROM J6 - 3 natural causes, 1 suicide, only death from J6 was a protestor,
so cry me a river about January 6th!
 
And no cop cars burned and there was no looting. Ok, some idiot took Nancy's podium and gavel.
 
To all of the above propaganda inspired answers.
I don't think the people that were at work in the Capital that day share y'alls version of the truth.
 
And no, everything I stated is fact, and not based on any propoganda. You just closed your eyes to the 2 years worth of rioting and burning of cities across the USA. You can feel free to open them any time you want :)
Stick to the subject. Jan 6 and the President falsely claiming that there was voter fraud that involves more than some local yocal back water town.

In fact, if you can produce a single AP, Newsweek, or Wall Street Journal article substantiating these "facts" I will give them consideration.

Better yet, videos of C-SPAN recordings of testimonies that will give any credibility to these claims.
 
Last edited:
Yeah Democrats oversaw 100's of actually-lethal riots for 2 years, directly inspired by their lies to black people that basically stirred up a frenzy that "everyone is after me" - and did absolutely nothing about it, in some cases supporting the rioters.

J6 comes and no building burns and nobody dies FROM J6 - 3 natural causes, 1 suicide, only death from J6 was a protestor,
so cry me a river about January 6th!
Which Democrats? By name. I personally have never supported the BLM movement, I have always said it was a propaganda tool to move independents to the right.

And, once again, I was correct about that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom