Well, it is the FBI that was supposed to give her "all" the files and they didn't. I guess you thing she was supposed to know what those files would be before she "didn't" get themPam Bondi is now blaming the FBI.
She said the files were on her desk, I assumed they were....Well, it is the FBI that was supposed to give her "all" the files and they didn't. I guess you thing she was supposed to know what those files would be before she "didn't" get them
And she thought she had what she requested.
I love Kristi's last report where she pointed out how employees were ratting each other out re the leaking in order to save themselves.
My guess is that the FBI or CIA was using Jeffrey in a honeypot blackmail operation. If they release the unredacted videos, photos, and documentation, they lose their ability to coerce (blackmail) those individuals. In other words, the perpetrators are more valuable to the government as assets than they are serving time in jail for sex crimes. Then again, I could be wrong.
That's fine against foreign adversaries, but not against US citizenry. If they are doing that, it needs to be exposed big time. Plus this isn't just sex crimes, it's crimes against underage children. The folks who were participating in this need to be outed no matter what.
It's just my feeble attempt at trying to understand why they wouldn't release the evidence. Maybe I need to put the spy
novels down for a while.The fall guy is dead, end of the trail.
But not his organizer. Hope she has actual body guards because she knows where all the bodies are buried.
And that goes for physically as well as mentally. I've heard a lot of stories in the past couple years of school districts and authors and event planners that should be in prison for mentally molesting kids.
I would think there is very little that may need to be redacted. Normally they will always redact some, but not all, personal details (addresses, S.S.#, dob, etc.) especially concerning minors and victims. Some Agent info too. These weren't like the Mar a Lago papers which contained top secret info. I wouldn't doubt that there are hundreds of benign 302's that don't contain any juicy details. Given that trump is surely named within those doc's I doubt you'll ever see much. I'm sure trump wouldn't hesitate to release them if they only contained info about Clinton. In fact those may be the only docs you'll see.
It's not a given at all that Trump or any other powerful figure for that matter is named in these documents anywhere. That's pure conjecture and remains to be seen. What is clear without knowing the names, is that the whole thing was a blackmail operation against those that had or have power. The word honeypot is the best description of what it is. We can now call it honeypot island. If you went to the island not knowing what was there and were appalled by it, then there isn't anything to be worried about IMO unless there is some other proof that you took the bait. If on the other hand, you went there on multiple occasions, there is a lot of explaining to do for your actions. We don't need to know the names of the children involved. Let that remain secret, just give us the names or evidence of wrong doing by the named individuals.
