See, there you are, devolving to name calling. This is what you say that conservatives do but the reality of it is that you are the one alienating the people who are trying to have a rational discussion with you.
Why do you think you own LGPT folks? And why do you think that MAGA supporters are rednecks? What kind of a slur is "redneck" anyway. What if we brought back the term "n*gg**"? How would that go over? At least "rednecks" don't think they own any.
Is that another slur? Is it possible for you to read what you write with a critical eye? Is it wrong to care about how the government spends the money it takes from me at g*npoint? Is it wrong to think that you shouldn't be deciding on whether or not to kill a baby after it is born? Is it wrong to think that a country without borders isn't a country at all? Is it wrong to believe the Bill of Rights has meaning?
What are you talking about??????? Listen to yourself. Who is forcing you to believe anything. You are participating in a conversation, although it just seems like a way for you to distribute slurs. Instead of attacking people you think you disagree with, why not engage in a conversation that does not end every time with you calling people names. Why not try to explain why YOUR solutions are better, cheaper, faster, more efficient? whatever? Maybe, if you actually think about what you think the solution to a problem is, you will see the gaps in the execution plan and maybe rework the solution so something that has a short, medium, and long term goals. Maybe spending my life listening to people's problems and helping them with solutions has warped my thinking. Goals are silly. Let's just go with virtue signalling. I'll feel better.
Apparently hyperbole is too subtle for you so I apologize for the intellectual challenge.