Brianwarnock
Retired
- Local time
- Today, 03:58
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 12,701
Rich said:Will I be allowed to mention the fact that I had a gollywog as a child and read Enid Blyton avidly?
Not sure of the point your making here
Brian
Rich said:Will I be allowed to mention the fact that I had a gollywog as a child and read Enid Blyton avidly?
Brianwarnock said:Of course some words have been used in an offensive manner so much that they are irredeemable "******" is such a word, but I suspect that those who use "Chinky" as short hand for a takeaway or meal have never used it as a derogatory word and have never come across it in that sense, does that make their use of it racist?
aren't they now seen as racist by definition?Brianwarnock said:Not sure of the point your making here
Brian
Rich said:aren't they now seen as racist by definition?
dan-cat said:No I don't think it does.
But you've clarified my point nicely. If someone has been brought up completely unaware of the origins of the use of the "n-word" and then proceeds to use the term in complete ignorance of its history does that change the fact that some may take offense? How is the listener supposed to know of the user's frame of reference?
My sole point is this, these terms were coined by morons. They have racial derivations and can quite easily be interpreted as an insult even though none was intended. I'm aware that some interpret these words with the meaning of their original use. Something which they are perfectly entitled to do. That's why I discard their use.
I'm not calling anybody a racist. I'm just saying I find these words inappropriate because of their original intent.
I may have misunderstood Dan, but I thought you wern't going to continue with this discussion.dan-cat said:No I don't think it does.
But you've clarified my point nicely. If someone has been brought up completely unaware of the origins of the use of the "n-word" and then proceeds to use the term in complete ignorance of its history does that change the fact that some may take offense? How is the listener supposed to know of the user's frame of reference?
My sole point is this, these terms were coined by morons. They have racial derivations and can quite easily be interpreted as an insult even though none was intended. I'm aware that some interpret these words with the meaning of their original use. Something which they are perfectly entitled to do. That's why I discard their use.
I'm not calling anybody a racist. I'm just saying I find these words inappropriate because of their original intent.
Dan-Cat said:That's it nothing more from me.
Dan-Cat said:This is a complete waste of time.
Dan-Cat said:You're talking utter garbage. Goodbye.
Dan-Cat said:I'm gonna let go of the bone now.
Rich said:Gosh one does so have to mind ones ps and qs
dan-cat said:But you've clarified my point nicely. If someone has been brought up completely unaware of the origins of the use of the "n-word" and then proceeds to use the term in complete ignorance of its history does that change the fact that some may take offense? How is the listener supposed to know of the user's frame of reference?.
Of course if somebody objects they would apologise and refrain, but if we follow that path on an international forum then I guess we need a sticky with forbidden words and phrases.
ColinEssex said:I may have misunderstood Dan, but I thought you wern't going to continue with this discussion.
Col
Brianwarnock said:Surprising how you managed to omit the next sentence of mine in your quote, thus giving the appearance that I would freely accept continued use of a word somebody found offensive.
dan-cat said:Take me away offica'
Rich said:The men in white coats are on their way
they've called on you before?dan-cat said:not again
Rich said:The men in white coats are on their way
Why do I get this vision of Danny being thrown out the back of the ambulance at 60mph when they discover he's not covered for this condition anymore having used up all his coverselenau837 said:My wanna make sure the insurance covers that diagnosis code.
Rich said:Why do I get this vision of Danny being thrown out the back of the ambulance at 60mph when they discover he's not covered for this condition anymore having used up all his cover
Rich said:Just thought I'd mention that since I don't have an oven at the minute I had two Chinkies this weekend, I must say I was highly suprised at their friendly greeting toward this racist when I entered the premises .