Second Civil War in USA

Probably a lot.





Nope.

It's not a question of covering it at all, everyone will cover it. It's a question of priority and ranking. CNN had it buried deep.

97% of all users who navigate to CNN.com are only going to pay attention to the first 5, 10, 25 headlines. Everything is about ranking and priority.

Going back to what I've often said about how the mainstream media deceives people. Oftentimes it's not about saying something directly false. It's just giving something a false priority whether over or under.

When I talk to more liberal friends, I can tell they simply don't seem to know about many current issues because they weren't things that the mainstream media felt supported the current liberal narrative, whatever that flavor of the week was..
 
It's just giving something a false priority whether over or under.
And who is setting that priority? Oh, its your perception of what needs to be a priority.
 
And who is setting that priority?
You are! That's the point. The priority is set by what you are interested in. Your browsing habits and searching is recorded and this dictates what is served to you next. It will be something that grabs your attention.

For instance, I had a spell where I liked watching "Karen" incidents. Now, I reckon 30% of what is served me is Karen incidents!
 
So the algorithm is king and "we" seek / gravitate to our echo chambers.
The service is so bad... I hate the snooping on what we browse or visit on the commercialised utilities - so many invalid and unwarranted assumptions.
 
I'm recruiting British AWF members to form a regiment, with the purpose of taking back America. MABA "Make America British Again"

Any ideas on who might be amenable to signing up?
 
As an anti-monarchist and advocate for a republic I can't do it (not that I reside in a Britain). Besides this is an un-civil war. In war all's fair. ;)
 
And who is setting that priority? Oh, its your perception of what needs to be a priority.
Exactly the point, and exactly therein lies the silliness of the reference to Rolling Stone's study, where a bunch of liberals tested the knowledge of conservatives on subjects liberals especially love (white people killing blacks, Trump, and yeah that's about it right there) - and then concluded "they're less knowledgeable".

On a liberal station you can't allow people to read articles that bolster the argument of reverse discrimination - you just cannot do it, because you've invested too much time into trying to persuade people that it doesn't exist :)
 
Last edited:

I love how he avoids bringing up the Presidential Records Act at all costs ;)

I do feel kind of sorry for regular MSNBC fans. In their defense, they literally have no clue how deceived they are.

Trump actually has several good defenses, mostly the PRA. And if the PRA allows him to declassify by taking them, then obstruction's a no brainer, as you can't have the wrongful intent to obstruct justice if justice wasn't being served.
 
@moke123

Ok, then, is this "front page news in your book" ?

This actually IS cnn's top story - the #1 story of the day. :ROFLMAO:

1686926488033.png
 
As a brief, but incomplete, conclusion; the baby boom generation has failed to keep the values of the "Greatest Generation" alive.
And sadly, we are the generation that trained the teachers who have forgotten the lessons of Communism.

I can't wait to hear what the homophobic slur from the crowd was and why it caused the game to be called early. Soccer players never struck me as snowflakes.
 
Society's numerous experiments to try to replace the basics of faith in God and together-for-life marriages/families have all failed miserably.
Many studies show having a 2 parent home with no divorce is the greatest predictor of [insert just about any Happy metric here] that can occur.

Are we ready to get back to the basics yet? Or do we need more painful experiences first? I'm sensing a lot of society is actually ready to make the course correction, but there may be enough resistors to cause a few more years of pain first.
 
And who is setting that priority? Oh, its your perception of what needs to be a priority.
The priority was and still is being set by a left wing cabal news media. The media colluded to actively suppress stories that would damage the then Biden campaign and now Biden administration. The priorities of what stories were to be reported was not established by the readers of the media.
 
Rolling Stone's study,
Yea, except it wasn't a rolling stone study. It's a 12 year old study by a New Jersey University.



She told Newsweek that while the man was demanding proof that her daughter was born female, his wife called her and the girl's other mother "genital mutilators", "groomers" and "pedophiles."

Pretty sure they're not liberals.
 
@moke123

Ok, then, is this "front page news in your book" ?

This actually IS cnn's top story - the #1 story of the day. :ROFLMAO:

View attachment 108447

Must be an algorithm showing you things you are interested in. For me it was way down the bottom of the page under Pride Month.

Another stellar example of American greatness. Again I'm sure they weren't liberals.
 
Must be an algorithm showing you things you are interested in. For me it was way down the bottom of the page under Pride Month.

Another stellar example of American greatness. Again I'm sure they weren't liberals.

LOL nice try, but no ... CNN's webpage headlines are the same for everyone.

However, they do change every few minutes.
 
I thought this thread wasn't a serious proposition. But seeing what Tucker just revealed in this clip, I'm a bit concerned:-

 
I thought this thread wasn't a serious proposition. But seeing what Tucker just revealed in this clip, I'm a bit concerned:-
When a hypothesized Civil War, evolves over time, from speculation to becoming physically "hot" is open for debate. The figurative "seeds" of what we are seeing today, in the US, were planted by the Obama administration. Obama was the "Manchurian Candidate". The unanticipated election of Trump dethroned the planned coronation of H.Clinton. The Democrats immediately moved to a Plan "B", which was to pursue a soft coup of the Trump administration. Early attempts such as Crossfire Hurricane, the Russia Hoax, the Mueller Witch-Hunt, and two unjustified impeachments fell short. One could say that this soft coup was eventually successful by manipulating the election process to install Biden as a figure head. Whether the hypothesized Civil War becomes physically "hot" or not is an unknown. But as Tucker pointed in the video above an in the video of Post #39 the Democrats are still aggressively pushing to establish a Stalinist like one-party state and are also actively using the justice system to pursue Beria's infamous strategy of "Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime." to cripple any Trump comeback.
 
Last edited:
I thought this thread wasn't a serious proposition. But seeing what Tucker just revealed in this clip, I'm a bit concerned:-

So Uncle Gizmo, just to let you know, even though these facts are undeniable, the Democrats have decided to label anyone who brings this up as a racist and they've decided that the whole thing has to do with white people not wanting brown people in the country. But of course that's not true at all, the problem is that the Democrats find ways to trick them into voting for them, thus they are automatic voters.

Anytime someone bitches to me about the so-called "racist great replacement theory", I always remind them that MATH IS ACTUALLY NOT A THEORY!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom